Hiring on gut feel is how businesses end up with the wrong people in the wrong seats. The candidate who interviews well, the one you just clicked with, the one who reminds you of yourself — none of those instincts are the same as evaluating who will actually do the job well. And when you interview several candidates over several days, memory blurs and the last good conversation wins by default.
The Interview Scoring Matrix replaces that with structure. You define the attributes that matter for the role and weight them by importance, then score each candidate one to five on every attribute. The tool calculates a weighted total for each person so they're compared on the same criteria, not on who left the strongest recent impression — and it flags red flags automatically, surfacing any attribute where a candidate scored a two or below. Then it gives you a recommendation: who leads, and whether that leader carries a red flag serious enough to pause on.
The matrix structures the decision; it doesn't make it for you. A red flag on culture outweighs a high total every time, and a two-or-below is rarely coached away — so the tool won't let you quietly average your way past it. This is how you hire on evidence while still trusting your judgment where judgment belongs.
An interactive spreadsheet that scores candidates on weighted criteria and flags red flags automatically. Part of the toolkit from The Freedom Point.